Speech of Nikolaus Erney before the administrative court of Cologne in case number 10 K 4722/19 at the suit of Maxim Erney, Natalia Erney, Nikolaus Erney on the recognition of illegal refusal to approve Maxim Erney's visit to the Russian school at the Russian Consulate of the Russian Federation in Bonn.
“The happiness of the whole world is not worth one tear on the cheek of an innocent child” Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky. "The Brothers Karamazov"
A German proverb says that "Truth is a bitter medicine"
And the court will have to drink this bitter medicine today.
And the German officials will have to drink this bitter medicine.
Today I will prove with documents, if, of course, the court has the courage and courage to listen to me and look at the documents of the court itself that today's Germany, to my great regret, is a Nazi state, self-reproducing itself every year, with Nazi laws, Nazi officials, a Nazi court and a Nazi the school system.
To defeat Nazism, to eradicate Nazism, you need to understand where he is.
The devil is in the details.
There is only one step from democracy to National Socialism, and we will see which one.
The German people are very trusting people, the years of state propaganda, starting right from the pots in kindergarten, are not wasted.
We believe that our laws are correct and beautiful.
We don't even think that the law itself can be a trap.
Or the law could be Nazi.
Or racist.
Or the construction of the law contains a logical or moral error.
We do not admit the thought that criminals wrote our laws.
Criminals convicted by the Nuremberg International Tribunal on October 01, 1946.
But Germany still continues to live according to the laws adopted by the Nazi criminals of the Third Reich, it still lives, unable to free itself from the shackles of Nazi laws in 73 years.
In fact, the Nazi slavery of the German people has lasted longer than 73 years, this slavery has lasted for 83 years.
In November 1932, bankers and industrialists demanded that President Hindenburg appoint Hitler to the post of Reich Chancellor.
On January 30, 1933, Hindenburg appointed Hitler head of the Reich Chancellor.
The fascist government abolished all and every constitutional bourgeois-democratic rights and freedoms written in the Weimar Constitution.
On February 4, 1933, the decree "On the Protection of the German People" was issued, which gave the police the right to prevent political gatherings if they could "disturb public peace" or if such a meeting allowed "offensive language" against the imperial officials.
Almost 86 years have passed, 1933-2019, and this law is still in effect.
See for yourself, until now any statements that are displeasing to the authorities, the authorities call "offensive expressions" in their address.
Look at the appeal of the head of Shulamt Cologne to the court on July 15, 2019 by the head of Shulamt Cologne Kaminke that he was offended by statements about crimes in his, Kaminke, work.
The head of Shulamt Cologne Kaminke wanted to file a criminal complaint on libel and false denunciation.
That is, we see that Nazi laws and law enforcement continue to operate after 86 years.
Hitler understood that he would not be able to achieve total control over the German people, without control over children's minds.
Article 147 of the Weimar Constitution prohibited private elementary schools, but they were not closed under the pretext that there was no money to compensate their owners (see. KuhnW. Schulrecht in Preussen. Leipzig, 1932).
Hitler understood that without total control over the children's minds of primary school age, he would never achieve total control over the German people.
The "Law on Compulsory School Education in the German Empire", which came into force on November 1, 1938, completely banned private schools.
And the SS security detachments quickly and efficiently enforced the law.
From 1938 to the present, 2019, for 81 years, there are no private schools independent from the state in Germany.
Some schools, such as English, French, American, Jewish, are not in the full sense public private schools, they are in fact class discriminatory closed institutions.
The cost of training in such schools is almost 50,000 euros gross per year (English, American) automatically cuts off any children from such schools except for the children of corrupt officials, millionaires, children of UN workers, for whom the UN pays.
Thus, for children from ordinary families, private schools independent of the state worth 50,000 euros are inaccessible, and other schools, although sometimes the word "private" is present in their name, in fact, according to the law on education, the educational process in them is controlled by the city administration.
What actually happened at the Clarenhof School in Cologne?
Why did we need approval to study at a Russian school at the Consulate of the Russian Federation in Bonn?
The court records contain a letter dated April 30, 2019 at 13:04 from the director of the Clarenghof School Charlotte Fischer to the city police, Mr. Beghard Cruft, where.
The director writes that the school has had three documented cases of children being strangled by a fellow practitioner, an Afghan refugee, Hamza Haymoid. Sometimes Hamza had to interrupt his studies and he (his parents) was taken from school.
Further, the director writes that in order to talk with the Hamza family, she needs to provide an interpreter, who will come today, perhaps after lunch. With the Hamza family, we (class leader, after-school teacher, sports manager, social worker) are in very close contact from the very beginning of the school year and the family is very cooperative - that is, they work with us.
I would like to note that 8 months have passed since the beginning of the academic year at the end of August 2018 to the end of April 2019, and the indication to the translator appeared for the first time.
An interesting question, in which language and how did the headmaster communicate from August 2018 to 2019?
The director knew Afghan and forgot?
Hamza's parents knew German and forgot?
Or did the director and Hamza's parents know English or another language and forgot everything?
Or did they use Google translate for 8 months, but then they were all banned from Google?
This answer from the director suggests that the director from August 2018 to April 2019 for 8 months very likely did not talk about Khamza's behavior and the attack on other students, for if they all talked for 8 months, they would already understand each other without an interpreter , eyebrow movement.
Hamza sometimes had a VERY individual schedule and did not attend school full time.
If there was a second teacher in the class, the whole class would have support.
Of course, one teacher controls Hamza, another teacher takes care of the whole class.
The report on the opening of the transfer process to the school for children with disabilities was sent before the holidays and we are awaiting a decision.
Unfortunately, the headmaster does not indicate in the letter before what holidays she sent the report.
But looking at another document of the court, namely in the letter of the Head of Shulamt Cologne dated May 17, 2019 12:29 pm, we will see that the decision on Hamza is already ready in the closet.
Dear Mrs. Ritter, dear Mrs. Fisher,Mr.Erney complains again and wants to go to a lawyer. I hope that a lawyer will be able to convince him that here in Germany children with special needs do not have to go to "idiot schools" (quoted by Mr. Ernay), but children here in Germany receive individual and exceptional support. Decision prepared by Mrs. Ritter, in a drawer on the table. I wish you a great weekend. In Monday I'm on vacation and I'm not available. Best wishes Jorg Kaminke.
I have a question, if the decision on Khamza was already ready on May 17, 2019 and by the end of April 2019 Khamza strangled three children in the class, then why Khamza continued to attend school until the end of the year in August 2019 and was not transferred immediately or sent to home training before the end of the year?
From the analysis of dates and correspondence, I come to the conclusion that there was no action to transfer Hamza to a special school, until my appeals in April 2019.
By the way, I have never and never said "schools for idiots", this is slander against me.
After a direct attack by Hamza on Maxim Erney, Maxim Erney refused to go to a German school.
From communication with parents from Cologne and Bonn, we learned that problem children like Hamza, due to the theory of inclusion, are now in almost all schools in Cologne and Bonn.
To go through all the schools of Cologne and Bonn in search of a good one, we have neither time, nor energy, nor desire, nor obligation, moreover, this is a trauma to the child and possibly not only mental but also physical disability of the child from attending such a German school.
Therefore, visiting a Russian school at the Russian consulate in Bonn, where there are no sick and aggressive children, since there is no inclusion in this school was the only possible and adequate solution.
Refusals to approve a visit to a Russian school first by Shulamt Cologne, and then Shulamt Bonn violate international treaties and conventions signed by the Federal Republic of Germany.
The actions and decisions of officials from the administration of Cologne and Bonn also violate, grossly violate the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.
Maxim Erney has two citizenships and two passports.
The Russian consulate, having provided a place for Maxim Erney at the Russian school at the consulate of the Russian Federation, absolutely legally defended the interests of a Russian citizen in Germany, which is consistent with Article 5 of the Convention on Consular Relations
By giving consent from the Consulate General or the School of the Consulate General of the Russian Federation, this was not only the action of Russian Diplomats, is not only a gesture of goodwill, but also the full implementation of the Vienna Convention, namely Article 5, which, if we open it, you can see in consular functions are included, firstly, under clause "a" "protection in the host state of the interests of the sending state and its citizens (individuals and legal entities) within the limits permitted by international law;" and paragraph "e" "providing assistance and assistance to citizens (natural and legal persons) of the sending state;" and the most important point that I see, which seems to me quite significant, is clause “h” “protection, within the framework established by the laws and regulations of the receiving state, the interests of minors and other persons without full legal capacity who are citizens of the sending state, in particular when it is required to establish any actions over such persons"
That is, in this case, the Russian side provided fully legitimate assistance and the decision of the administrations of the city of Cologne and the city of Bonn violates the Vienna Convention accordingly, they definitely interfere with the work of the consular office, and this is all the less obvious.
Refusal to approve a visit to a Russian school if Maksim Erney has Russian citizenship is an interference of Shulamt Cologne and Shulamt Bonn in the autonomy of the work of the consular office, and this is obvious.
The actions of the administrations of the cities of Cologne and the city of Bonn, the City of Cologne and Bonn, of course, are illegal, they not only violate the Basic Law of Germany, namely Article 1 of the Basic Law, which states Article 1. (1) “Human dignity is inviolable. Respecting and protecting him is the duty of all government authorities. " but also the second Article of the Basic Law, namely the second article states that Article 2. (1) “Everyone has the right to the free development of his personality to the extent that he does not violate the rights of others and does not infringe on the constitutional order or moral law. ”, In addition (2)“ Everyone has the right to life and physical integrity. Personal freedom is inviolable. Interference with these rights is permissible only on the basis of the law. "
The Erney family sought to be transferred to the School of the Consulate General of the Russian Federation, not least because his child was subjected to physical and psychological pressure and harassment, that is, the German authorities are not able to ensure his safety, not only unable, but moreover, not wanted to do this, the reason is more or less obvious, that they are from Russia, that is, we have not just some hidden, but rather open form of Russophobia.
Article three of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which says "Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person." no, and it cannot be, because if a child is beaten at school and the school is not able to protect the child from these beatings, then the child may be physically killed or injured at school.
Another clause of the convention, namely article thirteen, "Everyone has the right to move freely and choose his place of residence within each state." but "Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and return to his country."
That is, I, Nikolaus Erney, spoke about this, when I applied for further actions, I said that the family is Citizens of the Russian Federation and in this case we consider it possible and cannot say for what period they will be in Germany.
This question remained for them, it is really open, since I work under a contract and at any time my family can return to the Russian Federation.
Sources of law
"Universal Declaration of Human Rights" (adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 10, 1948)
VIENNA CONVENTION ON CONSULAR RELATIONS (Vienna, April 24, 1963)
The Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany (German Grundgesetz fur die Bundesrepublik Deutschland), or in short the Basic Law (German Grundgesetz, GG), is the German constitution, which enshrines the foundations of the country's legal and political system.
Nikolaus Erney
